Coin Ownership or Equity Ownership? The Real Question Is Being Asked Wrong

By: blockbeats|2026/03/30 03:44:29

Original Article Title: more on dual token + equity models in crypto
Original Article Author: @mdudas
Translation: Peggy, BlockBeats

Editor's Note: Amid the ongoing debate on "whether tokens are equivalent to equity" and "whether the dual structure is doomed to fail," this article offers a more restrained judgment, emphasizing that the key lies not in the structure, but in the people. Mike Dudas points out that tokens are not inherently superior to equity, and DAOs have not proven to be suitable for carrying application-layer projects requiring long-term leadership. What can truly survive the cycles are teams with long-term vision and execution.

As the boundary between tokens and equity becomes increasingly blurred, the dual structure of token + equity is becoming a common choice for application-layer projects. As observed by institutions like Delphi Digital, equity is moving onto the blockchain, and tokens are also converging toward equity-like properties. Mike Dudas reminds in the article that whether this hybrid model can be successful ultimately depends on whether incentives are aligned and commitments are continually fulfilled — this is becoming a watershed for application-layer projects in the next cycle.

The following is the original article:

There is no simple answer or "one-size-fits-all" solution to whether the "dual token + equity" structure is feasible. But there is one core principle: you must genuinely believe that this team is exceptional and possesses long-term thinking — they are the kind of team willing and capable of running things as if they were leading a company for decades to come.

In many cases, I would argue that for application-layer projects requiring long-term leadership, tokens may even be inferior to equity as a tool. For example, you will see that many protocol founders from the DeFi 1.0 era have largely stepped away from the projects; many projects are now maintained in a "maintenance mode" under the governance of DAOs or other part-time contributors, struggling to operate.

It turns out that DAOs and token-weighted voting are not good decision-making mechanisms, especially in application-layer projects — they struggle to make high-quality judgments in situations that require quick decision-making and rely on "founder-level" knowledge and capabilities.

Of course, the "pure equity model" is also not strictly superior to tokens in any sense. Binance is a good counterexample: tokens enable them to offer fee rebates, be used for airdrops and permissioned staking mechanisms, and a range of incentives and benefits related to the core business and blockchain ecosystem... things that are challenging to clearly express and achieve through traditional equity.

The so-called "Ownership Coins" themselves also have clear limitations: currently, they are difficult to truly embed in a product or protocol for internal use. Distributed applications and networks are fundamentally different from traditional companies (otherwise, why are we doing these things?), and pure equity tools themselves are not flexible enough. In the future, it is certainly possible that some form of "Equity-Plus" token will emerge, but this is not today's reality; coupled with the lack of clear market structure laws in the U.S. to date, launching a "quasi-equity token" with direct value attribution and legal rights remains highly risky.

Anyway, you can imagine a world similar to what Lighter describes: equity entities operating on a "cost-plus" basis, becoming the engine serving the token-driven protocol.

In this scenario, the equity entity is not aimed at maximizing profit but rather at maximizing the value of the token protocol and its ecosystem.

If successful, this would be an extremely valuable gift to token holders — because you own a well-funded lab-type entity (Lighter has a token treasury for long-term development), while core participants hold a significant amount of tokens and are thus strongly incentivized to drive token value growth; and the core token design still remains crypto-native, on-chain, and distinct from a relatively independent, more complex structured lab entity.

In such a structure, you have to trust the team. Because in most current designs, token holders do not have strong legal rights. But if you don't trust the team to execute and create value for the tokens they hold a large amount of, why did you get into the token in the first place?

Ultimately, everything depends on the team's ability, credibility, execution, vision, and proven behavior. The longer an excellent team stays in the market, continually delivering on what they promised to do, the more "Lindy Effect" their token will become.

Assuming the team communicates well and clearly conveys value through buybacks, meaningful governance mechanisms, and the real-world usability of the underlying protocol to the token, you will see in 2026: even in the presence of equity/lab entities, the very best tokens will truly stand out.

[Original Article Link]

On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows

Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

The art of absolute control. Inside Carl Moon’s Ferrari 296 Challenge quest at Le Mans, taming the storm together with the official WEEX livery.

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway

Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

WEEX introduces Deposit and Withdrawal Info on Dynamic Island for iOS. See fund transfer progress on your dynamic island, lock screen, or while using other apps. No more guessing. No more refreshing.

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading

In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.

As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.

The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy Trading

For elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.

To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.

The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.

By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.

Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× Leverage

In a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.

Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.

This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.

A Mature Foundation for Growth

The synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Overview of Important Market Events on June 8th

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

In-depth analysis of the "reflexivity" bubble trap in storage stocks: Beware of the backlash from the bullwhip effect and the false narrative of high growth; do not let the short-term myth of wealth become a wealth abyss that cannot be recovered for 25 years.

Get Paid to Onboard? Try WEEX’s New Homepage with Rewards for Registration, Deposit & Trade

WEEX just launched a brand new homepage and a 3-step new user onboarding guidance. Complete Registration → Deposit → Trade to earn exclusive rewards. Faster navigation, clear progress, and instant bonuses. Download the latest WEEX App to try it now.

WEEX Custom Layout: Build Your Perfect Trading Workspace in Seconds

WEEX introduces custom layout on futures trading page: left/right panel switch, hide/show core modules, full-screen focus, and one-click reset. Trade your way now.